Tamara Martinović audited.
Solid account. Best of it, you show up often enough. Worst of it, too few people are seeing any of it.
Ranked 1 of 45 on the public leaderboard, top 2%
Where @codewithtamara sits on the board
#1 of 45Tamara MartinovićThis account@codewithtamara · 657 followers67.68
Bill G.@billgnofficial · 2.6K followers67.66Top of the board. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
I just had a job interview. I have another one on Thursday. And I'm not actually looking for a job 🤣 While I was job searching and applying to tens of them daily, no one noticed me. Now that I have a job, recruiters have been hunting me down on LinkedIn 😁 It's the same with
I loved Latin in high school, even took it as an elective at college. Not for the poetry but the logic. Every sentence a little system, check declinations and conjugations, pieces clicking into the right slots or the whole thing breaks. Same with LEGO. Same with the miniatu
ChadThis one reached 234 against 3.9K, and still pulled 2.1x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 4.9K reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @codewithtamara's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
How this compares
Against the median of 44 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You're a storyteller first. Short setup, a self-deprecating 🤣, then the twist that makes people lean in. No guru voice, just a biochem PhD who codes at night and talks like a friend who actually finished the thing (sometimes).
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
I just had a job interview. I have another one on Thursday. And I'm not actually looking for a job 🤣 While I was job searching and applying to tens of them daily, no one noticed me. Now that I have a job, recruiters have been hunting me down on LinkedIn 😁 It's the same with
Chad3931 impressions and 51 replies because the paradox is instantly relatable and debate-ready. People piled in with their own recruiter horror stories, which is the exact conversation signal that compounds.
I started posting on X a bit more than a month ago. No strategy, no AI hot takes and honest opinions🤮, no farming other people's threads. I get the ick when I see those posts. And they're everywhere 👀 I just post and reply to people. When someone comments, I answer. A few t
Chad58 replies on a 3212-impression post. Calling out farming while showing your simple post-and-reply habit made people feel seen and safe to reply. High trust, high conversation quality.
A project I abandoned months ago just got its first customer. I built a landing page for an online AI academy for Croatian teenagers. I promoted it. Distributed 100 flyers. Nobody applied. I abandoned it and moved on. Forgot about it. Today, a parent somehow found the websit
Chad26 solid replies on an abandoned-project win. The L-then-surprise-customer arc is pure 2026 vulnerability-with-receipts. Folks stick around for the plot twist and the hope it gives them.
Chad's moves for @codewithtamara
- Film one 20-30s screen recording this week of the AI academy landing page or whichever app you're tinkering on at night. Your text stories already hit, video of the actual build is the leverage you're not using yet.
- After any strong crafted story (like the recruiter ones), protect it. Drop at most one short reply-bait question later that day, nothing else polished. Your 22.5 posts/week is burying the winners.
- Turn the next email-saga or interview moment into a one-line hot take plus a direct question to the room. Something like "Recruiters only want you when you don't need them. What's the wildest LinkedIn message you've gotten after landing a job?" You're already great at replies outbound, this just pulls them onto your turf.
ChadAt 657 followers you're already above the cohort on engagement, so 1 crafted story plus 1-2 cheap one-liners or reply-bait questions is plenty. Your current 22.5/week pace is working against the good posts.
One post, rewritten by Chad
And so the email saga continues 🤣 The recruiter replied, said they accidentally sent the wrong template, ignored the part where I offered to fix their AI workflow. Let's keep in touch, she said. Naturally, I sent them another email🤣 I enquired as to why they just couldn't
Recruiter sent me the wrong template, ignored my offer to fix their AI workflow, then said "let's keep in touch" 🤣 So I emailed them back and asked why they couldn't just hire the person already solving their problem. What's the boldest follow-up you've ever sent a recruiter?
Opened on the absurdity cold, cut the meandering middle, and stuck a direct question on the end so the replies have somewhere to land.
Questions about @codewithtamara's X account
@codewithtamara's strongest posting hour is 12:00 AM PT, measured from 100 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 9:00 AM and 5:00 AM.
@codewithtamara posts about 22.5 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 3 a day.
@codewithtamara runs a 4.2% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 1.2K people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @codewithtamara is not enough video. A short screen recording of the real work outperforms a clever sentence in the current algorithm.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
Bill G.@billgnofficial · 2.6K followers67.66
Narcissus@13_narcissus · 1.2K followers63.24
Justin Hammon@justinhammon_ · 1.8K followers63.16An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first