Narcissus audited.
Solid account. Best of it, you punch well above your follower count. Worst of it, not enough people react per view.
Ranked 3 of 45 on the public leaderboard, top 7%
Where @13_narcissus sits on the board
#3 of 45
Bill G.@billgnofficial · 2.6K followers67.66NarcissusThis account@13_narcissus · 1.2K followers63.24
Justin Hammon@justinhammon_ · 1.8K followers63.154.42 points behind #2. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
"Learn to code" was the advice of the 2010s. What's the equivalent advice for the 2030s?
My first paying customer taught me more than four years of building. Not because of the money. Because of the anger when it broke. Nobody gets angry at free. Anger is proof it matters.
ChadThis one reached 230 against 1.5M, and still pulled 13.7x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 13.3K reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @13_narcissus's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
What changed since last time
Compared with this account's previous audit, 1.7 days ago.
How this compares
Against the median of 44 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You write like a battle-scarred vet dropping cold truths in one or two lines, no warm-up. Short questions and hard observations that hand the mic straight to the room, with that 51yo AI-obsessed builder edge shining through every time.
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
"Learn to code" was the advice of the 2010s. What's the equivalent advice for the 2030s?
Chad1.4M impressions and 2848 replies because it named a real generational pain then asked the niche to finish the sentence, pure conversation fuel the algo supercharged into a storm.
A junior dev asks you: "Should I still learn to code in 2026?" You get one sentence. Go.
ChadThe one-sentence constraint made answering frictionless, pulling 213 replies on just 19k views and proving reply density beats raw reach for signal.
Hello from the build-in-public trenches 👋 51yo veteran dev. Obsessed with AI. Looking for peers grinding in: SaaS • AI Agents • AI Coding • Workflows • Mobile What are you building right now? Share below 👇
ChadSpecific niche list plus a direct 'what are you building' ask turned lurkers into sharers, sparking real peer threads even at modest volume.
Chad's moves for @13_narcissus
- After your next crafted banger, protect it: drop only one-line reply-bait later that day instead of more essays so the algo keeps pushing the winner.
- Your 700+ weekly replies are already elite volume, now aim 5-8 of them at slightly bigger AI/SaaS accounts with a specific observation so the targeting compounds faster.
- Ship one 20s screen recording this week of you using AI on a real hospital-IT or side-project workflow, then post the raw before/after numbers.
ChadYou're already at 30 posts a week, well above the 22 median, and that volume is diluting the heat after your viral. Three focused ones (one crafted + two short reply-baits) lets the good stuff breathe at 1.2k followers.
One post, rewritten by Chad
Consistency isn't posting every day. It's still being here when the excitement wears off. Most quit at week 6. Algorithms know it. Audiences know it.
Most quit at week 6. Algorithms know it. Audiences know it. Consistency isn't posting every day. It's still being here when the excitement wears off.
Flipped the order so the cold, specific claim hits first and creates the curiosity gap before the definition.
Questions about @13_narcissus's X account
@13_narcissus's strongest posting hour is 4:00 AM PT, measured from 100 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 3:00 AM and 10:00 AM.
@13_narcissus posts about 30.1 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 3 a day.
@13_narcissus runs a 0.8% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 15.7K people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @13_narcissus is the wrong posting cadence. More is not growth. Two strong posts beat six mediocre ones, and posting too much buries the best work.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
Justin Hammon@justinhammon_ · 1.8K followers63.15
Michael Boisson@shaostoul · 1.8K followers62.24
Pedro Guitian@pedroguiti · 1.2K followers62.09An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first