Pedro Guitian audited.
Solid account. Best of it, real conversation, not just likes. Worst of it, you reach fewer people than your follower count suggests.
Ranked 6 of 46 on the public leaderboard, top 13%
Where @pedroguiti sits on the board
#6 of 46
Michael Boisson@shaostoul · 1.8K followers62.24Pedro GuitianThis account@pedroguiti · 1.2K followers62.11
Yusuke@yusukelp · 1.6K followers60.450.13 points behind #5. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
Who else thinks marketing is 10x harder than building? Maybe even 100x
Today is day 67 out of 100 of posting every day from almost ZERO followers Getting closer to the end of the 3rd quarter of the challenge 🥳 This weekend I spend most of my time rebranding UseSurfer to GoBlume Having fun and learning along the way https://t.co/y3vIxg9xso
ChadThis one reached 475 against 4.4K, and still pulled 2.3x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 2.9K reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @PedroGuiti's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
How this compares
Against the median of 45 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You sound like the CS intern who's actually in the trenches: short, direct, zero fluff. Most posts are one-line questions or challenge updates that feel like you're just talking out loud to the room, not broadcasting. The emoji lists and day-count receipts give it that builder-diary rhythm nobody else in your lane is matching.
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
Who else thinks marketing is 10x harder than building? Maybe even 100x
ChadThat marketing-vs-building hot take hit 55 replies because it named the exact pain every SaaS founder is feeling right now and invited them to pile on, turning one line into a real conversation thread instead of passive likes.
Hey algorithm I am looking to connect with: 🍽️ SaaS founders 🚀 Tech enthusiasts 📲 Developers And people interested in: 📱 Product Development 🔥 AI tools 💻 Automation
ChadThe connect-with post racked 102 replies by making self-selection dead simple; people literally raise their hand in the replies, which the algorithm treats as pure rocket fuel at your size.
Why are you building a startup?
ChadWhy are you building a startup? is pure reply-bait that got 68 answers because it's open, personal, and zero-effort to answer, so the thread kept living long after the first hour.
Chad's moves for @PedroGuiti
- Kill the repeated Hey algorithm connect-with templates (they underperform your real questions by 8x) and replace one of them tomorrow with a raw day-X update that includes one real number from the GoBlume rebrand.
- Drop one 20-second screen recording this week of the rebrand or a UseSurfer-to-GoBlume before/after; your text already works, video is the missing weekly main event.
- You're already firing 540 replies a week, so stop spraying and make the next 6 outbound ones value-add comments on slightly bigger SaaS accounts instead of more connect requests.
ChadYou're at 1163 followers and already crushing volume at 23.9 a week, so dial to 1 crafted + 2 short reply-bait questions. That keeps the algorithm happy without burying your best stuff.
One post, rewritten by Chad
Hey X algorithm I just crossed 1,000 followers, and I am looking to connect with more people who are: 🍽️ SaaS founders 🚀 Tech enthusiasts 📲 Developers And also with people interested in these topics below: 📱 Product Development 🔥 AI tools 💻 Automation
Just hit 1,000 followers from almost zero. Who else is building in public right now and wants to swap notes on SaaS, AI tools, or the rebrand grind?
Swapped the spammy algorithm plea for a concrete milestone + open question so it sparks real replies instead of just emoji hand-raises.
Questions about @pedroguiti's X account
@pedroguiti's strongest posting hour is 3:00 AM PT, measured from 100 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 1:00 PM and 6:00 AM.
@pedroguiti posts about 23.9 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 3 a day.
@pedroguiti runs a 3.8% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 750 people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @pedroguiti is the wrong posting cadence. More is not growth. Two strong posts beat six mediocre ones, and posting too much buries the best work.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
Michael Boisson@shaostoul · 1.8K followers62.24
Justin Hammon@justinhammon_ · 1.8K followers63.17
Narcissus@13_narcissus · 1.2K followers63.27An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first