Marcus Brathwaite audited.
Solid account. Best of it, you show up often enough. Worst of it, you reach fewer people than your follower count suggests.
Ranked 9 of 45 on the public leaderboard, top 20%
Where @marcus_b1973 sits on the board
#9 of 451.21 points behind #8. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
Wow, can I get to 500 verified today? thanks so much for everyone's support so far, excited to see where this can go 🤝😀 https://t.co/tgRTc7dkB5
Update on the UI polish now published for melded, before and after. The original input screen was too complicated, not guided and not clear on the stage to follow, now it is a complete chat input with prompts for each stage of the process, side menu cleaned up, overall should be
ChadThis one reached 209 against 5.4K, and still pulled 2.8x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 1.1K reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @marcus_b1973's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
How this compares
Against the median of 44 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You're warm, humble, and numbers-first. Short metric dumps mixed with real thanks, zero fluff. Reads like a founder who ships and actually means it when the community surprises him.
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
Wow, can I get to 500 verified today? thanks so much for everyone's support so far, excited to see where this can go 🤝😀 https://t.co/tgRTc7dkB5
Chad141 replies on a simple milestone ask is the signal the algorithm loves most, you turned gratitude into a live conversation and the reach followed hard.
Thank you so much to all my mutals, followers, 𝕏 community, when I reactivated this account, I thought it would take months to get to 100! But the biggest learning so far is I did not know what a great community I would find here and that has been the biggest bonus on this https
Chad35 replies on a reactivation thank-you means people felt seen; that personal-stakes angle is why 1260 impressions still punched above your average.
Big thank you to everyone for continued support, when I started this I did not think I would get above 10 followers, so this is very humbling. Nearly at the magic 500 verified, will it happen today? https://t.co/qS0pGCR4q2
Chad24 replies plus the soft 'will it happen today' question kept the thread hot, humility paired with a clear mini-goal is your proven reply magnet.
Chad's moves for @marcus_b1973
- Ship one vulnerability-with-receipts post this week in the exact shape of your £0 MRR note, but open cold with the number so it stops the scroll the way your milestone posts do.
- Record a 30s screen recording of the melded chat UI before/after, that polish update was already your highest-resonance post, video will multiply it.
- Keep the heavy reply volume (you're already at ~220/week), just aim 5-8 of them daily at slightly bigger AI/startup accounts with one specific take so the targeting matches the effort.
ChadYou're at ~9.4 posts/week with 6.9% engagement against the cohort's 2% median while posting less than half their 21.8 volume. Two posts a day, one crafted build-in-public, one short conversation bait, keeps that quality edge without burying the good stuff.
One post, rewritten by Chad
melded, one month in: → 20 briefings run → 0 paid subscribers → £0 MRR Here's the honest read: this isn't a product problem. It's a distribution problem. I've been posting into a room with almost no one in it, a brand new account, cold audience, zero existing network.
20 briefings. 0 paid. £0 MRR. One month of melded and the honest read is simple: this is not a product problem. It is a distribution problem. Brand new account. Cold audience. Zero network. Fixing that next.
Led cold with the three brutal numbers so it hits like your milestone posts instead of burying the L under a label.
Questions about @marcus_b1973's X account
@marcus_b1973's strongest posting hour is 3:00 AM PT, measured from 70 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM.
@marcus_b1973 posts about 9.4 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 2 a day.
@marcus_b1973 runs a 6.9% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 220 people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @marcus_b1973 is first lines that do not hook. The opening line has to spark curiosity or drop a number, or the rest of the post never gets read.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first