Clayo audited.
Early days. Best of it, real conversation, not just likes. Worst of it, you reach fewer people than your follower count suggests.
Ranked 54 of 56 on the public leaderboard, top 96%
Where @clayoglesby sits on the board
#54 of 560.7 points behind #53. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
TLDR: Figure out what you want from life and change your habits to get there. It's a good piece but a little too much dick riding for what it is imo. Regardless, I'll do the exercise and report back.
Abstract coded. Zokus coded.
ChadThis one reached 284 against 7.9K, and still pulled 28x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 485 reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @ClayOglesby's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
How this compares
Against the median of 55 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You sound like a crypto-native designer who talks in short, dry flexes and half-jokes. Quick observations, zero corporate polish, just slang and receipts mixed with lifestyle crumbs. It reads like a group chat, not a content calendar.
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
TLDR: Figure out what you want from life and change your habits to get there. It's a good piece but a little too much dick riding for what it is imo. Regardless, I'll do the exercise and report back.
ChadNearly 8k impressions on a blunt TLDR reaction shows people stop for your unfiltered take on life/habits content, even when replies stay quiet.
Not to glaze but it's insane how much better X feels since @benjitaylor joined.
Chad5.4k impressions plus 68 likes and 3 replies means the soft community shoutout format hits hardest for you right now. Warmth + a named person = real resonance.
Have we ever considered the 4 year cycle is just a random dude with a calendar alert set for every 4 years to go activate another one of his hundred wallets to sell billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin he hasn't touched in 15 years?
ChadAlmost 4k views on the 4-year-cycle Bitcoin theory proves long-shot contrarian crypto jokes still get the algorithm to peek, even if likes lagged.
Chad's moves for @ClayOglesby
- Ship one build-in-public update this week on the crypto or AI app you're designing: a real screen, a decision you made, or a number. Your bio promises it and your feed barely shows it.
- Turn your strongest format (short hot takes) into reply-bait twice this week. End with a one-line question your crypto/AI circle can answer in seconds so those 40 weekly replies start landing on your own posts too.
- Protect the Benji-style community posts: after any strong crafted take, drop only a one-liner later that day. Don't bury the winners with random filler.
ChadYou're at 1.4 posts a week while the cohort median sits at 20.6. Two a day (one crafted, one cheap conversation line) is the minimum that lets a 1.4k account compound without burying anything.
One post, rewritten by Chad
Chinese takeout riding shotgun with the seat warmer on. Don't you ever say I don't know ball. https://t.co/g36hT6il9Q
Chinese takeout riding shotgun, seat warmer on full blast. Tell me you don't know ball without telling me.
Split the flex into a cold visual hook plus a direct challenge so it begs a reply instead of just vibing.
Questions about @clayoglesby's X account
@clayoglesby's strongest posting hour is 9:00 PM PT, measured from 100 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 6:00 PM and 6:00 AM.
@clayoglesby posts about 1.4 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 2 a day.
@clayoglesby runs a 1.4% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 344 people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @clayoglesby is the wrong posting cadence. More is not growth. Two strong posts beat six mediocre ones, and posting too much buries the best work.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first