Bill Wolfe audited.
Middle of the pack. Best of it, you show up often enough. Worst of it, you reach fewer people than your follower count suggests.
Ranked 33 of 46 on the public leaderboard, top 72%
Where @billwolfe sits on the board
#33 of 460.28 points behind #32. See the full board
Where this score comes from
Out of 100, weighted. Follower count is not a factor, but actually reaching people is. A small account with real conversation can beat a big one that broadcasts, and an account that reaches thousands still gets credit for it.
Reach vs resonance
The most-seen post and the one people actually reacted to are different posts. That gap is where the next win is.
I was the big winner tonight at poker. Went all-in on the last hand. The prize? “The basket of crap” a random basket of snacks. How it works: It’s a fun format. Hosted by my friends who run a MSP IT firm. They do it purely for networking and social and fun. Fake money, no http
I can't get this statement out of my head: "Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up." Do with that as you best see fit.
ChadThis one reached 216 against 959, and still pulled 5x the reaction rate. The reach on the big one was not the problem. What it said was.
Reach without conversation on the left. Real conversation on the right. Chase the right one and the left one follows.
What this engagement is made of
All 450 reactions across the posts Chad read. Bookmarks are not counted, here or anywhere else in this audit.
Golden hours
When @billwolfe's posts actually get seen, scored on this account's own data. Times in PT. Slots marked playbook are defaults, used where there are not enough posts at that hour to judge it.
The reply game
Replies are the most under-used lever on X. A good one is worth roughly 27x a like, so this is measured, not assumed. Chad reads the most recent page of replies, so the count is a floor, not a lifetime total.
How this compares
Against the median of 45 other accounts Chad has audited. Same measurements, same method.
Voice, according to Chad
You sound like a quiet mentor who drops one clean truth and steps back. Short declarative lines, faith woven in without the sermon, and that signature Build With God close. It reads more like a journal entry handed to a friend than a thread.
What this account is about
The 3 strongest posts, and why they worked
I was the big winner tonight at poker. Went all-in on the last hand. The prize? “The basket of crap” a random basket of snacks. How it works: It’s a fun format. Hosted by my friends who run a MSP IT firm. They do it purely for networking and social and fun. Fake money, no http
ChadThe poker recap won on pure scene, fake money, MSP friends, basket of crap, it felt like hanging out, which pulled 4 replies and a quote from people who wanted into the room.
Good morning. You'll never get this day back. Not because life is short. Because God made this one unrepeatable. Steward it well. Build With God.
ChadThe morning stewardship post earned 2 reposts because it opened cold and specific: God made this day unrepeatable. People hand that kind of line to someone else.
I joined a paid workshop today hosted by @danwestworld on writing better headlines for offers. Learned a lot. Biggest benefit? Spending money so I took it serious. Spent time. Iterated on ideas. Left confident and equipped. Good collab with other attendees helped too. 🙌
ChadThe workshop recap drove your best conversation of the three (5 replies) by naming the host, the real cost, and the feeling of leaving equipped. Proof beats theory.
Chad's moves for @billwolfe
- Cut hard to 2-3 posts a day. You are at ~49 a week versus the cohort median of 19, and that volume is burying the posts that actually land.
- Add one pure reply-bait question daily your faith-and-business niche can answer in seconds. Your quote posts already prove short lines work, put the ask on the end.
- Ship one 20-30s talking-head or screen recording this week: a framework you actually use, or the headline lesson from that workshop. You are not using short video yet and it is the highest-leverage weekly move.
ChadYou are firing ~7 posts a day and averaging only 142 impressions. Two crafted plus one short reply-bait lets the good ones breathe and match what accounts your size actually sustain.
One post, rewritten by Chad
https://t.co/6VVkRGmBWV
Most frameworks die in the notebook. This one survived contact with real life. Build With God.
A bare link has zero hook or reason to care, opened with tension so the click (and the save) has a job.
Questions about @billwolfe's X account
@billwolfe's strongest posting hour is 6:00 PM PT, measured from 100 of their own recent posts rather than a general rule. The next strongest are 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM.
@billwolfe posts about 48.9 times a week across the posts Chad read. Chad's recommended cadence for this account is 3 a day.
@billwolfe runs a 3.2% engagement rate, meaning that share of the people who see a post react to it. Their average post reaches 142 people. Follower count is not part of this measurement.
The single biggest opportunity Chad found on @billwolfe is the wrong posting cadence. More is not growth. Two strong posts beat six mediocre ones, and posting too much buries the best work.
Accounts scoring near this one
Closest scores on the board. Same measurements, same method.
An audit tells you what happened. Slap Post changes what happens next.
Everything above is one snapshot. Inside Slap Post, Chad rebuilds this every week as your numbers move, rewrites any post before it goes out, and schedules it into your golden hours. Our servers fire them on time even when your phone is off.
Start my 7-day free trial $29/mo after · cancel anytime · or just get a free audit first